Friday, April 4, 2014

So much cinema is happening right now

Wings of Desire (1987) dir. by Wim Wenders

Wings of Desire is an arthouse film par excellence. My father, a stolid, practical, military man with little time or tolerance for the arts would put it firmly in the category of cinema—pronounced, in his mocking, inimitable fashion, as 'see-nay-mah—and I would have to agree with him. It is as cinema as it gets. Among other cinema tropes, the film features:
·      Subtitles
·      Long, abstract meditations
·      Black & white cinematography
·      Poetry
·      Collage
·      Commentary on the act of filmmaking itself
·      Monologues
·      Juliette Binoche

Actually, Juliette Binoche isn't in this movie, but the rest of the list is accurate. It's a great film to namedrop to show that you know what's what. A weaker-willed person might use a film like Wings of Desire to look down her nose at the hoi polloi. So, given the film's seriousness, and my own tendency to lightly tease gravitas wherever I detect it, why did love this movie as much as I did? The answer lies partly in the film's unabashed sincerity. The central conceit in the film is that there are angels wandering around Berlin, invisible, able to listen to the grave and quotidian concerns of the city's denizens, and unable to do anything more than offer fleeting spiritual encouragement. The film's protagonist, Damiel, an angel, wants to become human. He wants to leave a world that is black and white, literally in terms of film stock, and, like Dorothy, enter a world of color, and feeling, and passion. His impetus for this decision is his love for Marion, an aspiring trapeze artist for a minor circus. Yes, you're reading that correctly. An angel falls in love with a circus performer.

That Wenders is able to execute this plot without resorting to the sort of maudlin, romantic banalities of the (superficially) similar City of Angels, or turning the movie into farce is a miracle. The film is carried through dangerous straits by an absolute sincerity matched by impeccable craftsmanship. At one point early on in the film, while the rules of the narrative are still being established, an angel puts an unseen, unfelt arm of comfort around one of Berlin's suffering citizens, and the latter is cheered, if only for a moment, and forgets his problems. I was touched. I may have even teared up a little. Let's change the subject.

There is also something attractive about angels desiring to leave a world of contemplation and spirit in order to experience the filthy, joyous, extravagant, mundane human world, especially since so many humans are attempting to flow in the opposite direction and attain a level of existence unstained by sensuousness. There is a danger here in yielding to a simple, perverse criticism of the longing for transcendence. This is avoided by having Damiel, once he takes human form, being moved by what would generally be considered trifling phenomena. "What color is that?" he asks a passerby. "That's blue," comes the response. "Blue," says Damiel, with the awe that only a man cured of congenital blindness could experience. The world as it is is already transcendent enough. Who needs heaven when there's blue in the universe? he seems to ask. Who, indeed? Excuse me, I seem to be tearing up again.


[Also, Nick Cave, who was recently shortlisted for Most Badass Musician in Existence, performs the song From Her to Eternity in a smoke-filled bar, and it is everything you could possibly hope for]

3 comments:

  1. Excellent post! This is cinema indeed, and its funny you mention that namedropping for this movie, as I've had that experience before. I casually mentioned it in a conversation with someone and they couldn't have been happier I had.

    I too am amazed at how well this was pulled off. It's a beautiful thing to have a comparison like City of Angels, and how a story like this would be told in the hands of another less talented director. There's just no comparison. Sidenote with spoiler: I still say that Meg Ryan's death in City of Angels is one of the greatest unintentionally hilarious moments in all of cinema. I'm also amazed when I watch some of the end scenes in Paris, Texas at how well those are pulled off. With long dialogue scenes between characters elaborating on misunderstandings, and making peace with each other. How those don't come across as cheesy, melodramatic, here comes the orchestra swell type moments, is amazing to me. Wenders is a master at this stuff. I think my favorite moment is of Casiell and the old man in the library. The old man looks through books, which seem to trigger recordings of certain parts of his life in his mind, mostly of the Holocaust I think. Beautifully done. Pass me a tissue Jason.

    I have to mention the cinematography in this movie, which to me was so good. The switching between B&W and color in this film works beautifully, and I just love the long takes, with dynamic camera movements. It adds another level of interest to certain moments, like Damiel sitting on the ground after just missing Marion, and the camera craning up, adding some disappointment to his failure to catch her in time. There's a great shot of Casiell, then the camera moves away, goes over the prison wall, and holds until Casiell magically has gone through the wall somehow, and meets up with Damiel. There's also something about that shot of Casiell just off stage right from Nick Cave where he stands alone and his shadow flickers against the wall, in a bobbing motion.

    One thing I'm not totally sure about is the quality of the film between the B&W and color. The B&W scenes looked cleaner, and just had more pop than the color scenes. I wonder if that was intentional to convey more of the grime of everyday life form a human's view, or something else. What were your thoughts on this? Did you feel the same way? It just felt ironic to me that he'd be leaving his world for something he perceives as more pleasing, and yet there was a downgrade in quality, for me at least.

    Such a great movie though, with many very moving scenes. Thanks for the excuse to revisit this. I'll have to watch all the bonus features now too. Bless you Criterion!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you see the Criterion bluray? I did, and I would agree that the picture quality in the color sequences were, for lack of a better world, grimy. At the same time, it's a fertile griminess, if that makes sense. Like the dirt and fertilizer that makes things grow. The black and white scenes, by contrast, are crisp and clear, but lack (oh god, I can't believe I'm using this word) the sensuality that color brings. I believe Wenders is ambivalent towards the two worlds the film presents. On the one hand, the B&W world is simple, elegant, and clear, but it lacks humanity, passion. The color world, on the other, is dirty and chaotic and dangerous, but also lively and filled with love and sex and hot dogs. I do love the idea that in a highly contemplative, exclusively spiritual environment, there are angelic creatures who wish they could experience human life, and vice versa.

      I still don't know how Wenders pulls off that monologue at the end. The trapeze artist goes on and on about love for what feels like an eternity and somehow, at the end of it, I thought, yeah, I'm buying this.

      Agreed about that Casiell shot. It stuck in my mind. Great effect.

      Delete
  2. I did watch the Criterion Bluray. It was fantastic overall. I like your point about ambivalence and both worlds having beings which want to be in the other. That would certainly explain ambivalence on the director's part.

    Have you seen Paris, Texas? There's more where that monologuing came from, and with similar quality. I LOVED all the monologues leading up to the ending of that movie, and then I didn't quite buy the last one. Most of the monologues seemed beautifully written, insightful, and emotional, but I didn't quite understand the angle on Marion's about representing the people, and wanting loneliness....but she had me at the last line... "I know it's you". Good stuff. Feel free to throw some interpretation my way on that last monologue.

    ReplyDelete